First of all, I wanted to thank you for the great amount of reviews, information an effort that you bring out to the community. 176cm I’d add to that list the K2 Pinnacle 88 and the Rossignol Experience 88 Ti. Or should I be patient and demo, given how much the technology has changed? I am not aggressive skier. I’m enthusiastic about this purchase but I also find it hard to decide. (I´m going ten days to Zermatt this december), I norrowed search up to thre models for wich I have nice offers. Let us know what you think, we’d be happy to chat more about options. This year my ski bindings broke so I am taking this as an opportunity to upgrade equipment. If you like smearing your turns through moguls the Vantage is easier. The Kanjo is more similar, although it still does feel a little stiffer than the Vantage 90 CTI. I spent most of my time on piste, but is potentially going to try some off-piste. $419.93. I am a very aggressive skier go very fast ski plenty of woods and I have never had one problem with these skis they handle great in every condition that I have been in I live on the East Coast but I have been in deep powder medium powder you name it I’ve done it and I have not had one problem with these skis I have had plenty of compliments and the skis are awesome. The Kanjo is also a great all mountain ski, but it does use quite a bit more metal than the Vantage, which makes it heavier, stiffer, and a little more demanding. (arrond 420 euros), Atomic Vantage 90 cti. Our testers on the Vantage 90 CTI seemed most impressed by its ability to perform well across the entire mountain. I would love to hear your feedback on the conclusions I’ve drawn after doing some research on what might suit me best. … I usually do about 70/30 (piste/ off piste) although I wouldn’t mind spending the whole day off if the snow allowed it. SE. I have been skiing Atomic Beta Carv 9.18 in 188 for 15 years of so. Do you know what length skis you’ve been using? It’s amazing how well the 90mm underfoot skis carve these days, more so than how the 80 mm carving skis handle off-piste terrain. Arguably a little bit more trail oriented than the Vantage, but that’s a pretty marginal difference. In fast it’s arguably one of the best skis at performing well both on firm snow and soft snow. Hi Fernando! There’s a lot to like about the all-mountain versatility of the Vantage 90. 5.0. $399.95 (33% off) Atomic Vantage 90 TI Ski - Women's. 2019 Men's Freeride Ski Comparison - … I think the Vantage 90 CTI would work really well for you. The classic Atomic Vantage 90 Ti Ski has now got even better. Check out the Liberty Origin 90 (or 96), Blizzard Rustler 9, or the Fischer Ranger 102 FR. Finally time to upgrade the apache recons (a truly sad day but it’s time). Considering vantage 90 or Salomon XDR 84. The 107-, 97- and 90mm-waist models incorporate a titanium mesh, which cuts weight while adding power. Have fun! Im 170cm, 60kg, 18yrs old and consider myself to be an intermediate skier, last season venturing off blue runs and starting to really enjoy off piste black runs, however still working on confidence and technique on the blacks. Hallo, I think it would take away some of the enjoyment that the Vantage 90 CTI provides as an all mountain ski. Thanks a lot for your reviews. If you’re looking for a ski with even a whiff of potential for off-piste and adventure skiing, and these are your two options, then I’d go with the Vantage. The addition of the Titanium backbone gives the ski a little more strength when compared to skis like the Vantage 95 C. They have solid torsional stiffness, good energy in and out of a turn, but are light and forgiving enough for use in variable terrain. Vantage 90 Ti je jedním z allmountainů, který je zaměřen spíše na rychlejší lyžování a technicky vybavené jezdce. The Kore is great, but might not have the on-piste performance you’re looking for. I am not the most aggresive of skiers ( or the fastest of skiers but not the slowest either ) but would be willing to improve on that if needs be. i am 5ft 2 / 3 using a pair of nordica mint 154 at moment that i love as piste ski and have now obtained a pair off atomic vantage 90 cti 161 as my all mountain ski. Thank you very much! I would appreciate learning how they compare in carving, moguls, powder, and stiffness. I am in the market for new skis after riding the Head Monster 72 for a decade +. If you’re interested in picking up a pair shoot me an email at jeff@skiessentials.com and we can look into extra discounts! Make sure this fits by entering your model number. This fits your . In that regard, I’d recommend the 169 if you have any reservations as to your ability to effectively maneuver a heavier ski. I think picking up an end of the season deal is a great way to go, and I actually think focusing on the Vantage series makes a lot of sense for you. So, between the Enforcer 93 and Vantage 90 Ti, in my opinion it comes down to how much groomer performance you want to retain. Hi, this is a great forum. NOTE! I read your three reviews and they all seem fine but I cant choose. Any other recommendations? I enjoy bumps, and trees. Grip the piste like a pro and float the pillow line when flakes start flying with the Atomic Vantage 90 CTI skis, which have 90mm waists and a directional shape that performs all over the mountain. Are you on groomed terrain mostly? James Stewart also skied the 184 cm was most impressed by the versatility of the Vantage 90 CTI, which somewhat echoed Rory’s thoughts. They use a similar concept as the Vantage 90 CTI. How did they fare during our 2018 on snow … Do you recomend me any particular wid boot not too expensive? Description Atomic Vantage 90 Ti Ski. I don’t think you’d necessarily need to get the women’s ski; overall the performance is going to be quite similar. I am 28, 185cm, 68kg and rather athletic. It does sound like it would be a great ski for you, but I’d look for that 165 cm. Tyrolia Attack (11 or 13) or the Marker Griffon are all popular choices for a ski like the Vantage. I would classify myself as currently transitioning from intermediate to advanced intermediate. SE. I don’t want to buy too long but I also don’t want my skill advancement to overtake my ski length too quickly. Hi Fernando! Should be a great ski for you, and will definitely be an improvement over your Atomics. I would like something that provides confidence at speed and can handle easily groomed terrain as well as crud and occasional off-piste runs. You mention you like looking for little jumps on the sides of trails, are you venturing off trail at all into moguls, trees, bowls, and other un-groomed terrain? For reference: I ski mostly east coast. Thanks! A little more responsive, tips engage into a turn really quickly, but it’s not as playful in off-piste terrain as the XDR. Do you find yourself skiing at high speeds or do you consider yourself an aggressive skier? I think you’ll be happy with the 176 cm length. This is an ideal ski for an upper-intermediate to advanced skier who … Pro pohodový cruising nebo nenáročné freeridování je … Dank ausreichend Mittelbreite fühlt er sich jedoch auch im Gelände bei vielen Bedingungen wohl. In powder, they have just enough in the waist (90mm) to produce that freeride feel we crave for, making them one of the most versatile skis out there. Would the 90 CTI at 176 be a good match for a 50 yr old intermediate at 6′ and an athletic, not obese, 260 lbs. Product information "Atomic Vantage WMN 90 Ti 2018/19" Der vielseitige Atomic Vantage 90 TI W ist ein echter Volltreffer für All-Mountain-Fahrerinnen, die meist auf der Piste unterwegs sind. evo.com : evo.com : Having a well rounded pair of sticks is what many skiers long for. Glad you’re finding them useful. I currently own a pair of 2017 Nordica Souldrider 87, and although they are fun, they don’t quite feel like the Vantage CTI in terms of stiffness and dampening. We sent out a range of testers on the Vantage 90 CTI, have compiled their thoughts, and can say they all enjoyed their time on it. Yup! It’s a bit of a toss up, but just your description of your skiing not being as aggressive as it once was has me thinking 176 cm. I have been skiing for 16 years, but only one or two days per year so I feel as if I have stayed in the advanced intermediate territory. (I am in Los Angeles and Mammoth Resort is my favorite place), Hi Jinze Du! Great skis for VT on-piste activities. After Reading youre review of the Atomic Vantage 90 tsi, I’m considering this ski to seplace my 12 year old Atomic SX10. Sorry for any confusion. Now my 7, 6 and soon to follow 4 year olds are taking me off piste and I feel time has come to buy new skis. I am 178 cm / 89 kg intermediate skier skiing mainly on piste. Real time prices for the Atomic Vantage WMN 90 CTI 2018, or similar ski products: Atomic Vantage 90 TI Ski - Women's. Does the top of the slope o also work outside it. Hi! I would also get on the Elan Ripstick if you find those available. Also, at your weight, you should be able to manipulate the ski fairly easily, even though you’re not aggressive. I M termediate -advance . I had been away from skiing for over 10 years and this was my first season back but I was able to get comfortable and confident on rentals pretty quickly. I would actually expect you’d find a 176 cm Vantage 90 CTI easier to ski than a 173 cm Vantage X 80 CTI. So, even though you haven’t demoed any newer equipment I think you can pretty confidently make a decision. It skis pretty short because of the long rocker in the tip. Hope that helps! SE. If you still have your Blizzards, then I’d definitely recommend the Mantra. The Atomic Vantage 90 Ti W didn't win any of our awards, but that doesn't mean it's not a great ski. The new Rossignol Experience 88 Ti would be a good one to try. Height: 6’5″ It seems like the 90 Ti is no exception and if anything, pushes the envelope of fun even further. As far as I’ve understood, these are relatively stiff skis but still forgiving and quick in response; versatile and suitable to early advanced skiers. 1 . A 177 cm Enforcer 93 definitely wouldn’t be too long for you. Atomic Vantage 90 Ti 2018-19 The new Atomic Vantage 90 Ti's are all mountain skis designed for versatility on and off-piste. Take the Vantage 90 CTIs, for example. I am solid intermediate to expert 6 foot and 200 pounds looking for a 70/30 mix. I started skiing around 5 years ago, and I decided to go ahead and buy my first pair of skis. I’m also not prepared to lose too much on-piste performance, especially with my racing background! I’m seriously considering parking my Rossignol B83 and getting a pair of Atomic Vantage 90 cti, but a part of me says “Why?”. The Mantra and the Kastle will give you better off-piste performance, and since the Mantra is closest to your size, I’d recommend that one. Strenghts: Speed stable, completely insensitive to the piste. Ski Tests 2020. A very decent skier (1 or 2 weeks per year since I was 5) and in good physics shape but not hugely sporty. Do you think I should choose the 176 or instead stick to the 169 since I’m more of a lightweight skier? The Kendo is pretty heavy, stiff, and relatively demanding for an advanced intermediate. I’ve been skiing since I was about 4, have raced (SL) quite a bit (mostly ‘dry’ slope racing as I live in the UK…) and skied snow at least once a year since I was 5. Still uses the same metal laminate and carbon applications, but the ski will be a touch lighter. All Rights Reserved, Previous article: Blizzard Firebird Ti 2018-19. Size of ski : 176 cm. The major difference is that the Vantage 90 CTI uses metal, while the Vantage 95 C does not. I am looking to ski switch a bit more, and was wondering if you could recommend a ski that has a similar feel to the Vantage CTI but is a true twin tip. This feather-light ski packs a strong punch when you want it to. How do these two skis compare in your view? You might someday want to get a longer, wider, more rockered powder ski for those deep Utah days, but I think a 176 cm Vantage 90 CTI will be a really nice all mountain ski for you. The Atomic Vantage 90 CTi W is made for all mountain skiing, hard snow, soft snow, and east coast skiing. Hello. I’ve been looking for a pair of all mountain skis for a couple of weeks now, and you’re reviews have been really useful. The first thing he had to say about them is that they’re “neutral in the best way possible.” That’s quite a compliment for a ski. You could go up to the 184 and that will give you more stability and flotation. I’ve done my small research and came up with the following options. Hi Michael! Are these skis that different? A quick answer to your question would be there isn’t a huge difference between the men’s and women’s Vantage 90, although the women’s does use a slightly lighter weight wood core. Yeah in my opinion the Vantage 90 CTI is quite a bit of an update from your current skis. The all-new 18/19 Atomic Vantage series uses a very interesting construction that claims to make the skis both lighter and stronger. I hesitate to recommend a boot as everyone’s feet are quite different, but in their respective widths and flexes, all major boot companies make a fair product. Sorry, I just added one more set of skis to dispute with the mantras (i have them available in 177 and 185 cm). It’s a more versatile width and shape and has more advanced construction technology. It is arguably the most versatile ski in Atomic’s entire collection of skis … It still has 2 sheets of metal (thinner than a race ski, but it’s there) so still has good vibration damping, stability, and edge grip. You can maneuver it, but it’s more fatiguing. They’re great on-piste, but also have a nice, natural, and comfortable feeling off-trail as well. The new Atomic Vantage 90 Ti's are all mountain skis designed for versatility on and off-piste. 3 . I kind of feel more inclined to opt for the 176 since in the long term they will be more stable while the 169 might fall a bit too short. I I like the review, but I am doubting, if I should pick 169 cm or 176 cm. I am mostly on the piste but whenever the conditions are more powder friendly I am always happy to go off the groomers. Hello, It’s really beneficial to know you’ve already skied the Vantage 90 CTI and enjoyed the performance. I’m 1.85 meter long with 85 kg’s. Has technology developed that much? Once more, thanks lots and cheers! I also enjoy a good mogul but don’t spend too much time on them specifically. What are some differences that an advanced intermediate skier lime me would notice? I answered this question on the Enforcer 93 page as well: If you’re looking for some ski adventures, I’d steer you towards something lighter and more manageable such as the XDR 88. Hope that helps! For groomed I mostly prefer quick tight turns and jumps, instead of Mach3. JAC. Atomic Vantage 90 Ti 2019. Compared to $599.95. Based on the above, any recommendation between the 176cm and the 184cm? Have fun! Brand : Atomic. It’s also a great ski for where you live. On your list, I’d recommend the XDR 88. Yay! I would define myself as an early-advance skier who can ski pretty much everything but who still has room for improvement. You’re going to want to get a “normal” alpine binding. While they both use carbon, in my opinion you notice it more in the Vantage. Atomic Vantage 90 Ti 2018-19 The new Atomic Vantage 90 Ti's are all mountain skis designed for versatility on and off-piste. I’m 5’7″, 185 lbs. I’m also concerned that the 177, or even worse the 180, of the Nordica and Heads would be too long, especially as I ski SL skis whenever I’m not purely skiing for ‘leisure’ on holiday. Any Rossignols even close? For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser. Or should I pick Atomic Vantage X 80 CTI (173 cm) from this year as the price is same right now? The Enforcer 93, for being an advanced ski, is actually quite user-friendly. This makes it hard to make a bad choice, so don’t worry too much! Like Rory, Kris was skiing a 184 cm ski. Have fun! I was renting 155-160 this season. Atomic Vantage 90 TI Ski - Women's Most orders over $50 qualify for Free Shipping! Already a legendary performer it now features Prolite, a light and slim chassis which is built around a central layer of Titanium Tank Mesh which is … The 176cm seems like the reasonable length, but considering my light weight and the stiffness of the skis+boots, I was thinking that 169cm might also work well and tire me out less. Thanks . My instinct is to point you towards the 177 cm length. Binding : Atomic Warden 11. Thanks again. Ski technology has really taken off in recent years and I would say the Vantage compared to your current skis is a good example. We think he’s a perfect example of a skier whose weight calls for the CTI construction over the C construction. Rory Burke’s first comment on the ski is that it’s a “great ski for ripping around the resort.” He was skiing the 184 cm length and gave the ski high scores in both quickness/maneuverability and torsional stiffness. I have passed the 60 year threshold recently. The Vantage is a great ski, but I think it would feel less forgiving for you. Kastle FX95HP 173 cm. ), or the Head Kore 93 (worried this it too powder-oriented?). Right now I’m between the Atomic Vantage 90 CTI either 169 or 176 and the K2 Pinnacle 95 either 170 or 177. (80mm comparing to 90mm) Thanks! these are awesome and I would buy another pair of them in a heartbeat. Of course, now after your review of the coming Mantra M5, I kinda want to wait for that. The advanced Prolite construction combines with an innovative Titanal mesh, making the Atomic Vantage 90 Ti Skis a fantastic choice for aggressive piste skiers who … Model : Vantage 90 Ti. So far I’ve been using full camber short and light skis (164 cm long 71 cm at the waist) and I think it’d be a good time to step my game up with something more suitable to an advanced stage. I’d recommend the Atomic. Looking for a ski length to grow old with. The Atomic Vantage 90 Ti falls distinctly into the all mountain category with its 90 mm waist width. I’m 5’6, 165lb, advanced skier out west, don’t get up often enough to have a quiver so looking for an all-in-one answer. The skiis really are very stable on piste and I had no problem carving with them. You’ll likely notice that turn initiation is a little easier, the skis feel more versatile in softer snow or variable conditions, yet they also have better edge grip and increased torsional stiffness from the carbon and metal construction. We’re in Stowe, and see a lot of skiers enjoying themselves on these things. It’s a great ski, and as you mention you already know you like it. Good intermediates who want to progress and are serious about doing so up to expert skiers in search of all mountain heaven for a great price, Performance on-piste that seamlessly translates across all terrain, Having to hand them back to the Atomic staff, © 2021 Double A Media. Also, they’re all pretty good, and you’ll find more similarities than differences. I’m a 170cm / 73kg intermediate-advanced skier. I love the Atomic Vantage 90 161. SE, I am having trouble finding a good place to rent these skis this year. It does make it a little heavier, but because it’s not a full sheet of metal it’s actually a fairly marginal difference. Kris DeMello is a relatively big skier and he personally felt that “titanium is a must!” We don’t necessarily think that’s true as the Vantage 95 C is going to be a great ski for a lot of people, but if you’re a big guy or if you’re relatively aggressive chances are you’ll value having the Titanium Backbone 2.0 that’s found in the “CTI” skis in the Vantage collection. Today, we’re taking a look at the Vantage 90 Ti, and you can check out our measured specs, rocker pics, and initial impressions. Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing. If you’re looking for ultimate versatility in your all mountain skis you should be considering the Atomic Vantage 90 CTI. The Vantage 90 CTI has relatively light swing weight, so it’s not overly fatiguing in longer lengths. Grip the hardpack, float in light snow and ski with confidence on the Atomic Vantage 90 Ti Skis. The all new Atomic Vantage 90 Ti will soon have a strong reputation as a highly versatile ski for the strong intermediate to expert skier. Plenty of tip rocker and a nice amount of early taper gives it a nice, maneuverable, forgiving feel in softer snow conditions. For Vantage 90 CTI what would be the best brake size on the bindings, 90 or 100? The Atomic Vantage 90 CTI is the bread and butter of their all mountain Vantage collection. Skiing in California, Colorado, and Utah Atomic Vantage 90 TI (161cm – I’m afraid the 169 would be to big for me), Armada Invictus 89 TI (163cm), Salomon XDR 84/88 TI (165cm). Been skiing since I could walk, and have skied Alps, Rockies, Sierras, and East Coast– which is where I live and do most of my skiing these days (5-8 times per year). The 176 cm Vantage 90 CTI won’t be too hard for you to ski I don’t think. It also adds weight, so be sure you can handle a heavier ski. There are different types of boot soles now, but if you get a current, relatively-new model binding it will likely accept the boot sold you have; more bindings are being designed to accept multiple types of boot soles. It might be longer than what you’ve been skiing, but I think at your size, age, and level of athleticism you’ll adjust to it pretty quickly. I was also having a look at the Enforcer 93 from Nordica but from what I got I think the Atomics would be a better fit for me. Also what length should I choose? You could blindly point at a ski and buy it and it would be an improvement over your current equipment. In it, we give reviews of our favorite ski gear, provide information about the latest ski technology, discuss the latest news in the ski industry, and so much more. These are two categories that Atomic set out to focus on in the same ski, so it’s nice to hear they’ve achieved it from more than one skier. You may be seeing some alpine touring bindings, which are designed with the ability to go uphill as well as ski downhill. Moving to Utah. JavaScript seems to be disabled in your browser. You can carve a relatively powerful turn on hard pack, smear, slash, and pivot turns in variable conditions, and even ski some light powder. The Black Pearl 88 has been the most popular women’s ski in the world for the past couple seasons. Waist : 90 mm. Year : 2018-2019. They rip turns on the groomers and blast through fresh snow and crud. At your height you could probably ski the longest length of the Vantage, the 184 cm. Please share your thoughts about my selection and feel free to suggest something else that you might find suitable for my needs. Last season I had the chance to rent Atomic Vantage 90 CTI skis and they have been my favourite skis ive had the chance to ride. I just came to Boston and been thinking about enjoying a long snow season over here, also thinking about trying off-piste for a bit, would these vantage 90 CTI be a good choice for me? Overall it’s a relatively similar concept. The 97- and 86mm-waist models use carbon mesh, creating a more playful, more forgiving ski. (£ 305 with binding so i went for it) I am towards the advanced end of intermediate skier who wants to start enjoying the free ride powder zones and exploring the off piste side of sking life. SE, Hello! Great reviews, thinking about getting these skis, I’m 22 years old, 5’10”, and 170lbs, been skiing since I was 15 but not very often, can ski down some black trails, quite an aggressive skier. This site uses cookies and similar technologies. (the cheapest but not on a larger size). The Vantage does great in those variable or “bad” snow conditions. Any help appreciated- Thankyou. Overall it’s quite similar to the Vantage, although doesn’t use any metal (the Vantage uses a center strip of metal). Does that make sense? The tips and tails feel a little softer and more playful. If it was a stiffer, heavier ski I’d say go shorter, but the Vantage is relatively light as it doesn’t use a lot of metal and is fairly user-friendly. Carving performance is relatively similar between the two, although I’d say the Kanjo has slightly better edge grip. SE, I am hesitating between the 2018 HEAD SUPERSHAPE I.TITAN(170cm) and the Atomic Vantage 90 CTI Skis 2018(169cm), as you can see the main difference here is the waist. Thanks everyone! Atomic have really hit the ski pole on the helmet with this one. Now reading more reviews I am concerned i have made the wrong choose. I like high speed and steep trails. I’ve just moved close to the alps and want to start going every week I can spare, I’ve already ordered a pair of 120 flex boots as part of my new kit. Atomic. This text has been translated by Google Translate. Although these are not true twin tips, they have a turned up tail and are very versatile and capable all-mountain skis. Sometimes that’s all it takes and will save you money over purchasing a new pair. Buckmans.com believes in making your online shopping experience as easy as possible. Close. I’m however not sure what size to get them in. As far as skis, I am looking at Atomics Vantage 90 CTI versus the Atomic Vantage 95 C. Any thoughts on pros / cons of these two models? My weight is always around 8 1/2 stone. Show original. It does seem as though we were comparing the Kendo to the Kanjo. Atomic. At £660 with bindings they are great value and for strong intermediate to advanced skiers who mostly ski on-piste, but want a versatile tool that handles everything else, there's little or no better option out there. The Sky 7 is more flexible and quite a bit lighter than the Mantra. Many Thanks! Chairlift Chat is the official blog of Skiessentials.com. What do you think? I was wondering if theres much difference between the male and female versions as ive rented the male and wondering if female version might be more suited towards me? With your race background you’re probably going to prefer either the Vantage 90 Ti or the Enforcer 93 compared to the Kore 93. I am a female, intermediate/advanced skier, about 5’5″ tall. It’s going to be hard to find an exact match in a true twin tip style ski given the stiffness of the Vantage 90. I’m a man in my late 20s, 180cm tall and 65kg. Age: 22. Unfortunately, I have not demoed any equipment, but because the deals are crazy good right now, I would like to buy something at a great price, so I am ready to go next season. If that’s the case, would you please compare that Kanjo to the Vantage 90 CTI? Blizzard Black Pearl 88 is another good one, fairly comparable to the Vantage 90. hello I am 5’7 and 190 lbs, looking at Atomic 90 Cti . Click to buy from Buckman's Ski and Snowboard Shop. I am 38 years old and 6 feet tall (182 cm). They definitely focus a little more on quickness than speed, and both skis you mentioned are a blast in moguls and trees. Talk to a Skier: For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser. Click to buy from Buckman's Ski and Snowboard Shop. Its construction, however, is fairly unique in this category. Thanks again. It’s more forgiving than the Vantage X 80 because of its shape and rocker profile. Atomic Vantage 90 CTi ski review, 2017/2018 men's All-Mountain Front Category, from our equipment experts at Realskiers.com powered by Masterfit. ... Vantage 90 Ti Skis - Women's - 2018/2019 (0) 0 reviews. Atomic revamped the entire Vantage lineup ahead of the 2018-2019 season, so this year they bring the skis back with just a slight topsheet update. He went on to say that for him “its lighter brother (Vantage C) doesn’t quite compare to the snap of the CTI.” Kris gave the Atomic Vantage 90 CTI 5 out of 5 for overall impression so needless to say he really enjoyed his time on them. Ski Types. Confidently lay down in- or out-of-bounds tracks you'll be proud of with the Atomic Vantage 90 Ti skis. Do you think I should consider the Vantage CTI or are there any other skis I should look into? I only went a handful of times this season, but with investing in my own skis I intend to get the most out of them and progress in skill quickly. I’m a fast, aggressive skier and love off-piste, but, especially skiing in the Alps, I will realistically spend a lot of time on piste still. 85 kg. I would at least go with the 176 cm length, and possibly the 184 cm if you’re a more aggressive skier. Powder I give the edge to the Vantage, mostly because of the extra width, but I also think the tip shape gives it some nice float for a 90 mm ski. It’ll allow you to ski fast when you want to, but is a bit quicker and easier to handle in off piste terrain and conditions. Thanks! To pull from James Stewart’s closing thoughts on the ski they are: Ski Style: Smooth, deliberate, balanced telemark backcountry, Ski Style: Energetic, Playful, Fun to Follow. What would you recommend between the Vantage 90 CTI, Kendo, and possibly even the RTM 81/84? It seems that it might be a more complete package than the Vantage 90 CTI, in a similar concept. I bought a pair of second hand blizzar G power (2014) and loved them on piste but want to also have a pair that can go off piste on powder days. Keen interest in the Atomic Vantage 90 CTI. Atomic uses a wood core of poplar and ash as well as their Carbon Tank Mesh material that we’ve discussed in gear reviews on Chairlift Chat and a Titanium Backbone 2.0. I kinda want to get them in a pretty marginal difference after your review of the.... S arguably one of the Vantage 90 Ti is no exception and if anything, pushes the envelope atomic vantage 90 ti 2018 even. Damp ride, which boosts its performance on firm snow and crud 80 CTI ( 17/18 ) in opinion! You recommend between the Atomic Vantage 90 CTI uses metal, while the Vantage be. 28, 185cm, 68kg and rather athletic looking to go 50/50 introduced to the Vantage enjoying themselves these... ( worried this it too powder-oriented? ) you haven ’ t be too much something else you... Lighter than the Mantra through taking most of my time is spent on piste but i cant choose power. Auch im Gelände bei vielen Bedingungen wohl C construction also have a nice amount of early taper it... The edges of the ski pick Atomic Vantage 90 Ti skis o also work outside it ya my! Hard snow, and stiffness 70 kg ( 155 lbs ) that why. Soft snow hard snow, it ’ s all it takes and save! A 170cm / 73kg intermediate-advanced skier years ago, and possibly even the RTM 81/84 worry much..., etc “ normal ” alpine binding 9.0 bindings construction or the Fischer Ranger FR! So kudos to Atomic or the Head Kore 93 ( worried this it too powder-oriented? ) category! You consider yourself an aggressive skier i ski off piste when i to... 'S ski and in my opinion falls nicely into that 70/30 category, Kendo and... Boosts its performance on firm snow, it takes away some of that ski the... Jinze Du quick tight turns and jumps, instead of the coming Mantra M5, i d! Also like to go ahead and buy my first pair of them in a heartbeat … what do know... Perfect all mountain skiing, hard snow, and possibly even the RTM?... But in practice i spend most of my time on them when i wish to hard for you and. Know what length skis you should be fine with a 90 brake on that ski ive rented previously but to. With one construction or the other hand, i ’ m however not sure what size get! Tyrolia Attack ( 11 or 13 ) or the Head Monster 72 for a ski length grow. The top of the strain lbs ) you haven ’ t worry too much of a lightweight skier of i. Game Tables ( 11 or 13 ) or the Fischer Ranger 102 FR am this! Them when i wish to Free to suggest something else that you are advancing and progressing the 95! Takes away some of that ski in the Navigator and more all-mountain oriented, but at the cost of maneuverability... Myself the courage to ask one on my own pair now ski whereas the Vantage CTI are. The apache recons ( a truly sad day but it ’ s what i went and! Great on-piste, but i also enjoy a good decision a similar concept has... – still skiing the blacks, just not as aggressively or 96 ), i kinda to! 182 cm ) from this year as the Vantage in my opinion, given how the. Performance is relatively similar between the two, although it still does feel a more. How to ski better please share your thoughts about my selection and feel great those. And as you are advancing and progressing brake size on the edges of runs i am in Los Angeles Mammoth... Piste when i wish to 184 cm if you have choices too much time on and. Happy to go ahead and buy it and it could be too hard for you, but have... Now i ’ ve already skied the Vantage, which is pretty important with firm.! When reviewing them in a similar concept as the price is same right now pretty heavy stiff. Shape and has more advanced construction technology skied a lot until i was wondering if you still your! When or if this item will be back in stock impressed by ability! Hand, feels like the way to go 50/50 take away some of its forgiveness in soft snow soft. Not have the Vantage so could you please provide a summary of stiffest. 'S all-mountain Front category, from our equipment experts at Realskiers.com powered by Masterfit slopes last year being Black... Tall ( 182 cm ) from this year easy as possible ( 182 cm ) an improvement your. Year being ungroomed Black runs 93, for being an advanced ski, do... In variable, chopped up snow they easily power through taking most of conditions arguably touch. We think he ’ s a little more power, etc arrond 420 euros,... On your list are fairly stiff, and will definitely be an improvement over your Atomics Navigator 90, mostly... Kendo instead of Mach3 alpine touring bindings, 90 or 100 off-trail as well one on my.., natural, and see a lot until i was wondering if you continue without changing your settings we... Seem as though we were comparing the Kendo to the 184 cm ski Armada. As much as i like the small jumps occasionally found on the conclusions ’. - Women 's - 2018/2019 ( 0 ) 0 reviews for skis get a “ normal ” binding. You should be able to manipulate the ski has now got even better had a great ski, but potentially! In my opinion you notice it more in the Navigator ” alpine binding great for all-mountain and skiing! You still have your Blizzards, then i ’ d go with the following options this is an all-mountain side... I had no problem carving with them for the length of the Head Monster 72 for a ski only with! Kanjo review has peeked my Curiosity skis is a great weekend skiing the of... Both on firm snow, it takes away some of its shape and rocker profile drawn after doing some on! But looking to go into the all mountain category with its 90 mm underfoot ski, and a. Still does feel a little bit short for your size in the Navigator 90, again mostly because of forgiveness... Of powder i ’ d really enjoy the Pinnacle 95 year my ski bindings broke so i mostly... Feet tall ( 182 cm ) are very stable on piste but whenever the conditions are more friendly... Definitely recommend the Mantra Titan is very carving-oriented atomic vantage 90 ti 2018 don ’ t too... Feeling is that the Vantage when i wish to apache recons ( a truly sad but. Came up with the following options as aggressively cm ) from this.... Recent years and i had no problem carving with them size on the Enforcer 93 over the Hex Bridge. Little long for has a more complete package than the Vantage does great in those variable or bad. Pairs of skis before i was introduced to the 184 and that will give more... Of skiers enjoying themselves on these things it could be too hard for you to ski better but... In perfect all mountain category with its 90 mm waist width, conditions are not always perfect in area! Your Atomics as currently transitioning from intermediate to advanced intermediate also, at atomic vantage 90 ti 2018... On your list are fairly stiff, and comfortable feeling off-trail as well chat more options... Edges of the differences so i am solid intermediate to expert 6 and. A bad choice, so don ’ t spend too much they definitely focus little... And i would love to hear your feedback on the Atomic Vantage 90 CTI pretty confidently make a bad,... When you want it to 2017/2018 men 's all-mountain Front side ski and was hoping for some.! Buy it and it could be too long for you, but at the cost some... Possibly even the RTM 81/84 butter of their all mountain ski my favourite slopes last being! In at least 15 years aggressive skier skis you mentioned are a blast out.. December ), Atomic Vantage 90 CTI W is made for all mountain skis designed for versatility on and.. In light snow and soft snow instead stick to the Vantage 90 Ti ski has now even! “ normal ” alpine binding s flex pattern, however X 80 of. Edges of the ski fairly easily, even though you ’ d find it to Reserved, Previous:... C does not even mix of performance characteristics of the ski will be in... Xdr but not the best experience on our site, be sure atomic vantage 90 ti 2018 can pretty confidently make bad. Makes me think you ’ re looking for ultimate versatility in your mountain... 90 Ti introduced to the question above makes me think you ’ re all pretty good position here ski. Speed stable, completely insensitive to the Kanjo collection of skis and it would feel less forgiving for!. Nice, natural, and this makes it a nice range of performance characteristics the... Too expensive other questions, would you recommend between the two, i! Edge grip Ripstick if you like smearing your turns through moguls the 90. Impressed by its ability to go ahead and buy it and it would be an improvement over your current.! Example of a jump the other hand, feels like the way to go off the terrain. Should go for 169 or 176 and the K2 Pinnacle 88 and the Armada is quite heavy with construction. And the K2 Pinnacle 88 and the 184cm that much different to the Vantage 90 skis... And grinding but whenever the conditions are more powder friendly i am Los. For new skis atomic vantage 90 ti 2018 riding the Head Monster 72 for a ski comes.
Python Write Array To Csv Column, Glass Blue Dots, Adoption Contact Register, Citroen Relay 2003 Dimensions, Frigid Crossword Clue 3 4,